Open Source LLMs Compared 2026 – 20+ Models You Should Know

    Open Source LLMs Compared 2026 – 20+ Models You Should Know

    Malte LenschMalte Lensch7. März 20266 min Lesezeit
    Till Freitag

    TL;DR: „20+ open-source LLMs compared side by side: Llama 4, Qwen3.5, DeepSeek-R1, Mistral, Gemma 3, and many more. With GitHub stats, hardware requirements, and a decision guide for the right use case."

    — Till Freitag

    Last updated: March 2026 – GitHub stars and model versions are updated regularly.

    Why Open Source LLMs Matter Now

    2025 was the year open-source LLMs closed the gap with proprietary models. In 2026, they're on par in many areas – or better. For businesses, that means more control, less vendor lock-in, and better GDPR compliance.

    This article gives you a comprehensive overview of the most important open-source LLMs – with real GitHub data, hardware requirements, and clear recommendations.

    The Big Comparison Table

    Model Provider Parameters GitHub ⭐ License Standout Feature
    Llama 4 Scout Meta 109B (17B active) 75,000+ Llama License 10M token context
    Llama 4 Maverick Meta 400B (17B active) 75,000+ Llama License Meta's best MoE model
    Qwen3.5-122B Alibaba 122B (10B active) 18,000+ Apache 2.0 Beats GPT-5-mini
    Qwen3-235B Alibaba 235B 18,000+ Apache 2.0 Thinking mode
    DeepSeek-R1 DeepSeek 671B (37B active) 30,000+ MIT Chain-of-thought reasoning
    DeepSeek-V3 DeepSeek 671B (37B active) 30,000+ MIT Multi-token prediction
    Mistral Large 2 Mistral 123B 37,000+ Apache 2.0 128k context, 80+ languages
    Mixtral 8x22B Mistral 141B (39B active) 37,000+ Apache 2.0 Sparse MoE pioneer
    Gemma 3 Google 1B–27B 6,000+ Gemma License Multimodal, on-device
    Phi-4 Microsoft 14B 12,000+ MIT Reasoning on small hardware
    Phi-4-Mini Microsoft 3.8B 12,000+ MIT Runs on smartphones
    Command R+ Cohere 104B 4,700+ CC-BY-NC RAG-optimized, 10 languages
    Yi-1.5 01.AI 6B–34B 7,800+ Apache 2.0 Strong multilingual support
    DBRX Databricks 132B (36B active) 3,200+ Databricks Open Enterprise MoE
    Falcon 3 TII 1B–10B 2,000+ Apache 2.0 UAE research project
    StableLM 2 Stability AI 1.6B–12B 8,500+ Stability License Compact & efficient
    InternLM 3 Shanghai AI Lab 8B 7,200+ Apache 2.0 Long context up to 1M
    OLMo 2 AI2 7B–13B 4,800+ Apache 2.0 Fully open (data + code)
    Jamba 1.5 AI21 Labs 52B (12B active) 900+ Apache 2.0 Mamba-Transformer hybrid
    StarCoder 2 BigCode 3B–15B 4,500+ BigCode OpenRAIL-M Code specialist
    CodeLlama Meta 7B–70B 16,500+ Llama License Code generation & infilling
    DeepSeek-Coder-V2 DeepSeek 236B (21B active) 12,000+ MIT Code + math specialist
    Qwen2.5-Coder Alibaba 0.5B–32B 18,000+ Apache 2.0 Code completion, multi-lang

    Top Models in Detail

    🦙 Llama 4 (Meta)

    Meta's latest generation comes in two flavors: Scout (109B, 10M context) and Maverick (400B, for quality). Both use Mixture-of-Experts – only 17B parameters are active per query.

    Strengths:

    • Largest context window of any open-source model (10M tokens with Scout)
    • Strong community and ecosystem
    • Multimodal (text + image)

    Weaknesses:

    • Llama License isn't "true" open source (commercial restrictions above 700M MAU)
    • Large models require significant hardware

    GitHub: github.com/meta-llama/llama-models · 75,000+ ⭐


    🌐 Qwen3.5 (Alibaba)

    Currently the strongest open-source MoE model. 122B parameters, only 10B active – runs on a MacBook with 64 GB RAM. → Our Qwen3.5 deep dive

    Strengths:

    • Beats GPT-5-mini on most benchmarks
    • Apache 2.0 – true open source
    • 262k context window (expandable to 1M)

    Weaknesses:

    • No multimodal (text only)
    • Chinese provider – compliance concern for some organizations

    GitHub: github.com/QwenLM/Qwen3 · 18,000+ ⭐


    🔬 DeepSeek-R1

    The model that shook the AI world in early 2025. 671B parameters with MoE (37B active), specialized in chain-of-thought reasoning.

    Strengths:

    • Reasoning quality on GPT-o1 level
    • MIT license – maximum freedom
    • "Thinking" mode shows the reasoning process

    Weaknesses:

    • Very large – local use only with high-end hardware
    • Chinese provider

    GitHub: github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1 · 30,000+ ⭐


    🌊 Mistral Large 2

    Mistral's flagship: 123B parameters, 128k context, 80+ languages. Europe's counterweight to the US and Chinese models.

    Strengths:

    • European provider (Paris) – easier GDPR narrative
    • Strong multilingual capabilities
    • Apache 2.0

    Weaknesses:

    • Smaller community than Llama or Qwen
    • Fewer specialized variants

    GitHub: github.com/mistralai/mistral-inference · 37,000+ ⭐


    💎 Gemma 3 (Google)

    Google's open model family from 1B to 27B – optimized for on-device use. Multimodal from 4B.

    Strengths:

    • Multimodal (text + image) even in small variants
    • Runs on smartphones and Raspberry Pi
    • ShieldGemma for safety

    Weaknesses:

    • Gemma License has usage policies (not pure Apache 2.0)
    • Maximum size only 27B

    GitHub: github.com/google/gemma.cpp · 6,000+ ⭐


    🧠 Phi-4 (Microsoft)

    Microsoft's "Small Language Model" with 14B parameters that beats larger models at reasoning tasks.

    Strengths:

    • Outstanding quality per parameter
    • MIT license
    • Runs on consumer hardware

    Weaknesses:

    • No multimodal in the base variant
    • Small context window (16k)

    GitHub: github.com/microsoft/phi-4 · 12,000+ ⭐


    Coding LLMs Compared

    For developers, there are specialized code models:

    Model Parameters Languages Standout Feature
    StarCoder 2 3B–15B 600+ Trained on The Stack v2
    CodeLlama 7B–70B ~20 Infilling & long contexts
    DeepSeek-Coder-V2 236B (21B active) 300+ Code + math combined
    Qwen2.5-Coder 0.5B–32B 90+ Best open-source code model per size

    Our recommendation: Qwen2.5-Coder-32B for maximum quality, StarCoder 2-3B if it needs to run locally on a laptop.

    Decision Matrix: Which Model for Which Use Case?

    Your Use Case Recommended Model Why
    Analyze GDPR-sensitive documents Qwen3.5-122B locally Best quality/resource ratio
    Code generation & refactoring Qwen2.5-Coder-32B Beats larger models at code
    Complex reasoning DeepSeek-R1 Chain-of-thought at GPT-o1 level
    Run on smartphone/edge Gemma 3 (4B) or Phi-4-Mini Optimized for minimal hardware
    RAG with company data Command R+ Built for Retrieval-Augmented Generation
    Maximum context (long documents) Llama 4 Scout 10M token context window
    European provider required Mistral Large 2 French company, Apache 2.0
    Fully open training data OLMo 2 Only model with completely open data
    Multi-agent workflows DeepSeek-V3 or Qwen3-235B Strong tool use and function calling

    Hardware Guide: What Do You Actually Need?

    RAM / VRAM Models (quantized, Q4) Example Hardware
    8 GB Phi-4-Mini, Gemma 3 (1B–4B) MacBook Air M3, RTX 3060
    16 GB Phi-4, Gemma 3 (12B), Yi-1.5-9B MacBook Pro M3, RTX 4070
    32 GB Mistral 7B, Llama 3.3-8B, Qwen2.5-14B MacBook Pro M4, RTX 4090
    64 GB Qwen3.5-122B, Mixtral 8x22B MacBook Pro M4 Max
    128 GB+ DeepSeek-R1, Llama 4 Maverick Multi-GPU server, Mac Studio Ultra

    Licenses: The Devil in the Details

    Not every "open-source" model is equally open:

    License Models Commercial Use Restrictions
    Apache 2.0 Qwen, Mistral, Yi, Falcon, OLMo ✅ Unrestricted None
    MIT DeepSeek, Phi ✅ Unrestricted None
    Llama License Llama 4, CodeLlama ✅ Up to 700M MAU Above 700M MAU: Meta license needed
    Gemma License Gemma 3 ✅ With conditions Usage policies apply
    CC-BY-NC Command R+ ❌ Non-commercial Research & personal only

    Tip: For commercial projects, prefer Apache 2.0 or MIT. With Llama, check carefully whether the usage terms fit your case.

    How to Run Open-Source LLMs Locally

    The easiest ways to start an open-source model on your machine:

    1. Ollama – One command: ollama run qwen3.5 – done
    2. LM Studio – GUI for non-developers, drag & drop GGUF models
    3. vLLM – For production deployments with high throughput
    4. llama.cpp – C++ runtime, maximum CPU performance

    → More about GGUF, GGML, and Safetensors

    Our Take

    The question is no longer "cloud or local?" – it's "which model for which task?". Our recommendation:

    • Cloud APIs for customer chatbots and creative tasks (Claude, GPT-5)
    • Open source locally for sensitive data, bulk processing, and prototyping
    • Hybrid architecture as the goal: the best model for every job, regardless of provider

    The future doesn't belong to one model – it belongs to the architecture that's flexible enough to use any model.


    → Our AI services → Qwen3.5 deep dive: 122B parameters on your laptop → AI agents compared

    TeilenLinkedInWhatsAppE-Mail

    Verwandte Artikel

    The Best OpenClaw Alternatives 2026 – from NanoClaw to NullClawDeep Dive
    21. Februar 20268 min

    The Best OpenClaw Alternatives 2026 – from NanoClaw to NullClaw

    OpenClaw has 160,000+ GitHub stars – but not everyone needs 430,000 lines of code. We compare the best alternatives in 2…

    Weiterlesen
    Why We Switched from ChatGPT to Claude – and What We Learned About LLMs Along the Way
    20. Februar 20265 min

    Why We Switched from ChatGPT to Claude – and What We Learned About LLMs Along the Way

    We worked with ChatGPT for 18 months – then switched to Claude. Here's our honest comparison of all major LLMs and why C…

    Weiterlesen
    OpenClaw Self-Hosting Guide: GDPR-Compliant in 30 Minutes
    28. Februar 20264 min

    OpenClaw Self-Hosting Guide: GDPR-Compliant in 30 Minutes

    Self-host OpenClaw with Docker, persistent storage, and local LLMs via Ollama – fully GDPR-compliant because no data eve…

    Weiterlesen
    NanoClaw: The Lean Successor to OpenClaw – An AI Agent That Fits in Your Pocket
    21. Februar 20264 min

    NanoClaw: The Lean Successor to OpenClaw – An AI Agent That Fits in Your Pocket

    NanoClaw is the minimalist successor to OpenClaw – an AI agent that runs on a Raspberry Pi, is controllable via WhatsApp…

    Weiterlesen
    Base44 vs. Lovable 2026 – An Honest Comparison
    6. März 20265 min

    Base44 vs. Lovable 2026 – An Honest Comparison

    Base44 and Lovable both promise prompt-to-app magic – but they take very different approaches. We compare code ownership…

    Weiterlesen
    Lovable vs. Webflow vs. Framer – Which Tool for Your Next Web Project?
    6. März 20264 min

    Lovable vs. Webflow vs. Framer – Which Tool for Your Next Web Project?

    Lovable, Webflow, or Framer? We compare three leading website builders – with honest assessments, pricing, and clear rec…

    Weiterlesen
    The 11 Best AI Meeting Assistants in 2026 ComparedDeep Dive
    26. Februar 20268 min

    The 11 Best AI Meeting Assistants in 2026 Compared

    Fireflies, Otter, tl;dv, Fathom, Fellow, Granola, Jamie, Zoom AI Companion, Memoro, Claap, or monday Notetaker – which A…

    Weiterlesen
    Time Tracking in monday.com: The Ultimate Guide 2026Deep Dive
    26. Februar 20269 min

    Time Tracking in monday.com: The Ultimate Guide 2026

    Every option for time tracking in monday.com – from the native column to Marketplace apps and monday Vibe. With pricing …

    Weiterlesen
    Lovable vs. Bolt vs. v0 – Which AI Web Builder Is Right for You?
    24. Februar 20265 min

    Lovable vs. Bolt vs. v0 – Which AI Web Builder Is Right for You?

    Lovable, Bolt.new, or v0? We compare the three most popular AI web builders – with honest assessments, pricing, and clea…

    Weiterlesen