
Open Source LLMs Compared 2026 – 20+ Models You Should Know
TL;DR: „20+ open-source LLMs compared side by side: Llama 4, Qwen3.5, DeepSeek-R1, Mistral, Gemma 3, and many more. With GitHub stats, hardware requirements, and a decision guide for the right use case."
— Till FreitagLast updated: March 2026 – GitHub stars and model versions are updated regularly.
Why Open Source LLMs Matter Now
2025 was the year open-source LLMs closed the gap with proprietary models. In 2026, they're on par in many areas – or better. For businesses, that means more control, less vendor lock-in, and better GDPR compliance.
This article gives you a comprehensive overview of the most important open-source LLMs – with real GitHub data, hardware requirements, and clear recommendations.
The Big Comparison Table
| Model | Provider | Parameters | GitHub ⭐ | License | Standout Feature |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Llama 4 Scout | Meta | 109B (17B active) | 75,000+ | Llama License | 10M token context |
| Llama 4 Maverick | Meta | 400B (17B active) | 75,000+ | Llama License | Meta's best MoE model |
| Qwen3.5-122B | Alibaba | 122B (10B active) | 18,000+ | Apache 2.0 | Beats GPT-5-mini |
| Qwen3-235B | Alibaba | 235B | 18,000+ | Apache 2.0 | Thinking mode |
| DeepSeek-R1 | DeepSeek | 671B (37B active) | 30,000+ | MIT | Chain-of-thought reasoning |
| DeepSeek-V3 | DeepSeek | 671B (37B active) | 30,000+ | MIT | Multi-token prediction |
| Mistral Large 2 | Mistral | 123B | 37,000+ | Apache 2.0 | 128k context, 80+ languages |
| Mixtral 8x22B | Mistral | 141B (39B active) | 37,000+ | Apache 2.0 | Sparse MoE pioneer |
| Gemma 3 | 1B–27B | 6,000+ | Gemma License | Multimodal, on-device | |
| Phi-4 | Microsoft | 14B | 12,000+ | MIT | Reasoning on small hardware |
| Phi-4-Mini | Microsoft | 3.8B | 12,000+ | MIT | Runs on smartphones |
| Command R+ | Cohere | 104B | 4,700+ | CC-BY-NC | RAG-optimized, 10 languages |
| Yi-1.5 | 01.AI | 6B–34B | 7,800+ | Apache 2.0 | Strong multilingual support |
| DBRX | Databricks | 132B (36B active) | 3,200+ | Databricks Open | Enterprise MoE |
| Falcon 3 | TII | 1B–10B | 2,000+ | Apache 2.0 | UAE research project |
| StableLM 2 | Stability AI | 1.6B–12B | 8,500+ | Stability License | Compact & efficient |
| InternLM 3 | Shanghai AI Lab | 8B | 7,200+ | Apache 2.0 | Long context up to 1M |
| OLMo 2 | AI2 | 7B–13B | 4,800+ | Apache 2.0 | Fully open (data + code) |
| Jamba 1.5 | AI21 Labs | 52B (12B active) | 900+ | Apache 2.0 | Mamba-Transformer hybrid |
| StarCoder 2 | BigCode | 3B–15B | 4,500+ | BigCode OpenRAIL-M | Code specialist |
| CodeLlama | Meta | 7B–70B | 16,500+ | Llama License | Code generation & infilling |
| DeepSeek-Coder-V2 | DeepSeek | 236B (21B active) | 12,000+ | MIT | Code + math specialist |
| Qwen2.5-Coder | Alibaba | 0.5B–32B | 18,000+ | Apache 2.0 | Code completion, multi-lang |
Top Models in Detail
🦙 Llama 4 (Meta)
Meta's latest generation comes in two flavors: Scout (109B, 10M context) and Maverick (400B, for quality). Both use Mixture-of-Experts – only 17B parameters are active per query.
Strengths:
- Largest context window of any open-source model (10M tokens with Scout)
- Strong community and ecosystem
- Multimodal (text + image)
Weaknesses:
- Llama License isn't "true" open source (commercial restrictions above 700M MAU)
- Large models require significant hardware
GitHub: github.com/meta-llama/llama-models · 75,000+ ⭐
🌐 Qwen3.5 (Alibaba)
Currently the strongest open-source MoE model. 122B parameters, only 10B active – runs on a MacBook with 64 GB RAM. → Our Qwen3.5 deep dive
Strengths:
- Beats GPT-5-mini on most benchmarks
- Apache 2.0 – true open source
- 262k context window (expandable to 1M)
Weaknesses:
- No multimodal (text only)
- Chinese provider – compliance concern for some organizations
GitHub: github.com/QwenLM/Qwen3 · 18,000+ ⭐
🔬 DeepSeek-R1
The model that shook the AI world in early 2025. 671B parameters with MoE (37B active), specialized in chain-of-thought reasoning.
Strengths:
- Reasoning quality on GPT-o1 level
- MIT license – maximum freedom
- "Thinking" mode shows the reasoning process
Weaknesses:
- Very large – local use only with high-end hardware
- Chinese provider
GitHub: github.com/deepseek-ai/DeepSeek-R1 · 30,000+ ⭐
🌊 Mistral Large 2
Mistral's flagship: 123B parameters, 128k context, 80+ languages. Europe's counterweight to the US and Chinese models.
Strengths:
- European provider (Paris) – easier GDPR narrative
- Strong multilingual capabilities
- Apache 2.0
Weaknesses:
- Smaller community than Llama or Qwen
- Fewer specialized variants
GitHub: github.com/mistralai/mistral-inference · 37,000+ ⭐
💎 Gemma 3 (Google)
Google's open model family from 1B to 27B – optimized for on-device use. Multimodal from 4B.
Strengths:
- Multimodal (text + image) even in small variants
- Runs on smartphones and Raspberry Pi
- ShieldGemma for safety
Weaknesses:
- Gemma License has usage policies (not pure Apache 2.0)
- Maximum size only 27B
GitHub: github.com/google/gemma.cpp · 6,000+ ⭐
🧠 Phi-4 (Microsoft)
Microsoft's "Small Language Model" with 14B parameters that beats larger models at reasoning tasks.
Strengths:
- Outstanding quality per parameter
- MIT license
- Runs on consumer hardware
Weaknesses:
- No multimodal in the base variant
- Small context window (16k)
GitHub: github.com/microsoft/phi-4 · 12,000+ ⭐
Coding LLMs Compared
For developers, there are specialized code models:
| Model | Parameters | Languages | Standout Feature |
|---|---|---|---|
| StarCoder 2 | 3B–15B | 600+ | Trained on The Stack v2 |
| CodeLlama | 7B–70B | ~20 | Infilling & long contexts |
| DeepSeek-Coder-V2 | 236B (21B active) | 300+ | Code + math combined |
| Qwen2.5-Coder | 0.5B–32B | 90+ | Best open-source code model per size |
Our recommendation: Qwen2.5-Coder-32B for maximum quality, StarCoder 2-3B if it needs to run locally on a laptop.
Decision Matrix: Which Model for Which Use Case?
| Your Use Case | Recommended Model | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Analyze GDPR-sensitive documents | Qwen3.5-122B locally | Best quality/resource ratio |
| Code generation & refactoring | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Beats larger models at code |
| Complex reasoning | DeepSeek-R1 | Chain-of-thought at GPT-o1 level |
| Run on smartphone/edge | Gemma 3 (4B) or Phi-4-Mini | Optimized for minimal hardware |
| RAG with company data | Command R+ | Built for Retrieval-Augmented Generation |
| Maximum context (long documents) | Llama 4 Scout | 10M token context window |
| European provider required | Mistral Large 2 | French company, Apache 2.0 |
| Fully open training data | OLMo 2 | Only model with completely open data |
| Multi-agent workflows | DeepSeek-V3 or Qwen3-235B | Strong tool use and function calling |
Hardware Guide: What Do You Actually Need?
| RAM / VRAM | Models (quantized, Q4) | Example Hardware |
|---|---|---|
| 8 GB | Phi-4-Mini, Gemma 3 (1B–4B) | MacBook Air M3, RTX 3060 |
| 16 GB | Phi-4, Gemma 3 (12B), Yi-1.5-9B | MacBook Pro M3, RTX 4070 |
| 32 GB | Mistral 7B, Llama 3.3-8B, Qwen2.5-14B | MacBook Pro M4, RTX 4090 |
| 64 GB | Qwen3.5-122B, Mixtral 8x22B | MacBook Pro M4 Max |
| 128 GB+ | DeepSeek-R1, Llama 4 Maverick | Multi-GPU server, Mac Studio Ultra |
Licenses: The Devil in the Details
Not every "open-source" model is equally open:
| License | Models | Commercial Use | Restrictions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apache 2.0 | Qwen, Mistral, Yi, Falcon, OLMo | ✅ Unrestricted | None |
| MIT | DeepSeek, Phi | ✅ Unrestricted | None |
| Llama License | Llama 4, CodeLlama | ✅ Up to 700M MAU | Above 700M MAU: Meta license needed |
| Gemma License | Gemma 3 | ✅ With conditions | Usage policies apply |
| CC-BY-NC | Command R+ | ❌ Non-commercial | Research & personal only |
Tip: For commercial projects, prefer Apache 2.0 or MIT. With Llama, check carefully whether the usage terms fit your case.
How to Run Open-Source LLMs Locally
The easiest ways to start an open-source model on your machine:
- Ollama – One command:
ollama run qwen3.5– done - LM Studio – GUI for non-developers, drag & drop GGUF models
- vLLM – For production deployments with high throughput
- llama.cpp – C++ runtime, maximum CPU performance
→ More about GGUF, GGML, and Safetensors
Our Take
The question is no longer "cloud or local?" – it's "which model for which task?". Our recommendation:
- Cloud APIs for customer chatbots and creative tasks (Claude, GPT-5)
- Open source locally for sensitive data, bulk processing, and prototyping
- Hybrid architecture as the goal: the best model for every job, regardless of provider
The future doesn't belong to one model – it belongs to the architecture that's flexible enough to use any model.
→ Our AI services → Qwen3.5 deep dive: 122B parameters on your laptop → AI agents compared








