Agency Software Compared: MOCO, DAV, Papierkram, Troi & More – And Why You Still Need monday.com

    Agency Software Compared: MOCO, DAV, Papierkram, Troi & More – And Why You Still Need monday.com

    18. Februar 20266 min read
    Till Freitag

    TL;DR:No single agency tool does it all. The winning formula: Specialized financial software + monday.com for project management – connected via make.com."

    Till Freitag

    The Companies at a Glance

    Before comparing features, let's look at the companies behind the tools:

    MetricMOCODAVPapierkramTroieasyJOBScoro
    Founded201520102014199919972013
    HeadquartersZurich, CHMunich, DEBerlin, DEMunich, DEMunich, DETallinn, EE
    Employees~30~20~15~40~30~250
    Revenue (2025)n/an/an/an/an/a~$30M
    Customers3,000+1,500+50,000+1,000+800+3,000+
    Developers (est.)~15~10~8~20~15~100
    StatusPrivatePrivatePrivatePrivatePrivatePrivate
    Valuationn/an/an/an/an/an/a
    Last FundingBootstrappedBootstrappedBootstrappedBootstrappedBootstrappedSeries B (€16M)
    Market Share (est.)<1% (DACH)<1% (DACH)<1% (Freelancer)~2% (DACH)~1% (DACH)<1% (global)

    Note: MOCO, DAV, Papierkram, Troi and easyJOB are bootstrapped DACH specialists – only Scoro has received VC funding. All figures based on publicly available sources (as of February 2026).

    The Dilemma: All-in-One vs. Best-of-Breed

    Agencies face a fundamental choice: one tool for everything or specialized tools that work together?

    Reality shows: All-in-one solutions are typically weak at project management – and specialized PM tools like monday.com don't include built-in accounting. The answer lies in smart integration.

    This article compares the most important agency management solutions in the DACH region and shows why a modular stack wins.

    The Contenders

    MOCO – The Modern Swiss Player

    MOCO comes from Switzerland and impresses with its clean UX design. The software focuses on time tracking, budget control, and invoicing – everything agencies need on the financial side.

    Strengths:

    • Intuitive interface, fast onboarding
    • Solid time tracking with timer and stopwatch
    • Good quoting and invoicing
    • DATEV export
    • Good API, make.com compatible

    PM weaknesses:

    • No real task boards with dependencies
    • No Gantt charts or workload views
    • No task-level automations

    DAV (Die Agenturverwaltung) – The German Controller

    Die Agenturverwaltung is built specifically for the German market and offers deep controlling with a focus on contribution margins and profitability.

    Strengths:

    • Deep project controlling with budget vs. actual comparisons
    • DATEV integration and GDPR-compliant
    • Comprehensive quoting and invoicing
    • API available, make.com compatible

    PM weaknesses:

    • Very rudimentary PM features
    • No visual project management
    • No team collaboration at task level

    Papierkram – The Bookkeeping Specialist

    Papierkram is primarily an accounting solution with time tracking attached. Ideal for freelancers and small agencies.

    Strengths:

    • Very affordable, starting at €0/month
    • Simple time tracking
    • GoBD-compliant, DATEV export
    • Quotes, invoices, expenses

    PM weaknesses:

    • No project management to speak of
    • No team management
    • Very limited integration options

    Troi – The Enterprise Veteran

    Troi is an established solution for larger agencies with comprehensive resource management.

    Strengths:

    • Extensive resource management
    • Controlling and budgeting
    • Media planning
    • Proven in large agencies (50+ employees)

    PM weaknesses:

    • Outdated UI, steep learning curve
    • Limited workflow flexibility
    • Expensive licensing
    • Limited automation capabilities

    easyJOB – The All-in-One Attempt

    easyJOB tries the all-in-one approach: from calculation through project management to billing.

    Strengths:

    • Very comprehensive feature set
    • Calculation → Project → Billing in one system
    • Media planning and cost tracking

    PM weaknesses:

    • Complex, unintuitive interface
    • Long implementation time
    • Hard to customize for individual workflows
    • Limited API and integration options

    Scoro – The International All-Rounder

    Scoro comes from Estonia and offers work management plus finances in one platform.

    Strengths:

    • PM and finances in one tool
    • Good dashboards and reporting
    • English-speaking, internationally deployable
    • API available

    Weaknesses:

    • Not optimized for DACH market (no DATEV)
    • Higher price point
    • PM features mediocre compared to specialists

    Teamleader Orbit – The Belgian Agency Solution

    Teamleader Orbit comes from Belgium and offers an all-in-one solution specifically for agencies: project management, time tracking, budget control and invoicing in one tool.

    Strengths:

    • Project planning with capacity management
    • Integrated time tracking and budget monitoring
    • Invoicing directly from projects
    • Good API and integration options
    • Internationally deployable (multilingual)

    Weaknesses:

    • Less deep controlling than DAV or Troi
    • No DATEV export (not DACH-optimized)
    • PM features solid but not at monday.com level

    The Big Comparison

    CriterionMOCODAVPapierkramTroieasyJOBScoroTeamleader Orbit
    Time tracking✅ Excellent✅ Good✅ Simple✅ Good✅ Good✅ Good✅ Good
    Invoicing
    Controlling✅ Good✅ Deep❌ Minimal✅ Deep✅ Good✅ Good⚠️ Medium
    DATEV export
    Project mgmt⚠️ Basic⚠️ Minimal❌ No⚠️ Outdated⚠️ Complex⚠️ Medium✅ Good
    Task boards⚠️ Basic✅ Kanban
    Gantt/Timeline⚠️⚠️⚠️
    Automations⚠️ Basic⚠️ Basic
    API/Integrations✅ Good✅ Good⚠️ Limited⚠️⚠️ Limited✅ Good✅ Good
    make.com support⚠️
    UX/Modernity✅ Modern✅ Solid✅ Simple❌ Outdated❌ Complex✅ Modern✅ Modern
    Price (from)~€15/user~€20/user€0On requestOn request~€26/user~€30/user

    The Pattern: Most Are Weak at Project Management

    What stands out: Most solutions don't offer serious project management. Teamleader Orbit stands out positively here – with Kanban boards, Gantt charts and capacity planning. Yet even Orbit doesn't match the flexibility and automation depth of monday.com.

    For agencies in the DACH region, there's an additional factor: Without DATEV export, Teamleader Orbit remains limited for accounting. The best-of-breed approach remains superior.

    The Solution: The Modular Agency Stack

    Instead of betting on an all-in-one that compromises in both areas, we recommend the best-of-breed approach:

    monday.com (Project Management)
        ↕ make.com (Automation)
    MOCO / DAV (Finances & Controlling)

    monday.com delivers what agency tools lack

    CapabilityAgency softwaremonday.com
    Visual task boards✅ Kanban, Table, Cards
    Gantt & Timeline✅ With dependencies
    Workload planning✅ Per-person capacity
    Automations✅ 200+ templates
    Dashboards⚠️ Finance only✅ Everything real-time
    Client communication✅ Updates, email integration
    Forms✅ Briefing forms
    Integrations⚠️ Limited✅ 200+ native apps

    make.com as the bridge

    make.com connects monday.com bidirectionally with your financial software: connects monday.com bidirectionally with your financial software:

    • Project created in monday.com → Automatically created in MOCO/DAV
    • Time logged in MOCO/DAV → Appears at task level in monday.com
    • Status updates flow in both directions
    • Invoice status is reported back to monday.com

    This creates a seamless data flow without duplicate work.

    MOCO vs. DAV: Which Financial Tool Fits You?

    If you choose the best-of-breed approach, the choice comes down to MOCO vs. DAV:

    CriterionMOCODAV
    Ideal forModern agencies valuing UXAgencies needing deep controlling
    UX✅ Modern, intuitive✅ Solid, functional
    Controlling depthGoodVery deep (contribution margin, profitability)
    DATEV
    API quality✅ Well documented✅ Good
    make.com✅ Native✅ Via HTTP modules
    Origin🇨🇭 Switzerland🇩🇪 Germany
    Price~€15/user/month~€20/user/month

    Our recommendation:

    • MOCO if you want a lean, modern setup and fast team onboarding
    • DAV if deep controlling and contribution margin analysis are business-critical

    Both integrate beautifully with monday.com + make.com.

    Conclusion: Best-of-Breed Beats All-in-One

    The days when one software had to do everything are over. The modern agency stack consists of:

    1. monday.com – for project management, team coordination, and client interaction
    2. MOCO or DAV – for time tracking, accounting, and controlling
    3. make.com – as the invisible bridge connecting everything

    The result: Every tool plays to its strengths, data flows automatically, and your team works where they're most productive.


    Want to set up the modular agency stack? → Book a consultation

    TeilenLinkedInWhatsAppE-Mail

    Related Articles

    monday.com + Die Agenturverwaltung (DAV): Manage Projects, Run Your Agency – Connected via make.com
    February 18, 20263 min

    monday.com + Die Agenturverwaltung (DAV): Manage Projects, Run Your Agency – Connected via make.com

    How agencies combine monday.com for project management with Die Agenturverwaltung (DAV) for time tracking, invoicing & c

    Read more
    monday.com + MOCO: The Perfect Agency Duo – Connected via make.com
    February 18, 20262 min

    monday.com + MOCO: The Perfect Agency Duo – Connected via make.com

    How agencies combine monday.com for project management with MOCO for time tracking & billing – seamlessly integrated via

    Read more
    Why You Can't Do Without Middleware Beyond a Certain PointDeep Dive
    February 23, 20266 min

    Why You Can't Do Without Middleware Beyond a Certain Point

    Native integrations only get you so far. Why middleware like make.com or n8n becomes the indispensable backbone of your

    Read more
    make.com Automation – The Ultimate Guide (2026)
    July 15, 20253 min

    make.com Automation – The Ultimate Guide (2026)

    make.com is the most powerful visual automation platform. Learn how to build workflows without code – including a compar

    Read more
    Visualization of a make.com scenario with error routes, retry loops, and breakpoint markers
    April 16, 20265 min

    make.com Error Handling & Retry Strategies: Building Resilient Scenarios (2026)

    Complex make.com scenarios fall over without proper error handling. Here's how to build error routes, retry logic, and c

    Read more
    3D visualization of an observability stack with Datadog dashboards, heartbeats, and Make scenario cards
    April 16, 20266 min

    Monitoring & Observability for make.com: Datadog, Better Stack & Native Tools (2026)

    Make.com only runs in production once you see errors before the customer calls. Here's how to build a three-layer monito

    Read more
    3D visualization of stratified glass panels with performance gauges, bundle-size meters, and a filter funnel – symbol image for Make performance optimization
    April 16, 20266 min

    make.com Performance & Operations Optimization: Bundle Size, Filters, Aggregators (2026)

    Make.com bills per operation – and slow scenarios cost twice: in money and in latency. Here's how to optimize bundle siz

    Read more
    3D visualization of a vault on a circuit board surrounded by data streams and lock icons – symbolizing make.com security
    April 16, 20265 min

    make.com Security & Secrets Management: Connections, Webhooks, IP Whitelisting (2026)

    Make.com scenarios handle API keys, customer data, and production webhooks. Here's how to secure connections, webhook en

    Read more
    Importing Data into monday.com – 4 Ways to Get Your Data In Cleanly
    March 4, 20265 min

    Importing Data into monday.com – 4 Ways to Get Your Data In Cleanly

    Excel upload, API, middleware, or automated scripts – we compare 4 ways to import data into monday.com, with practical e

    Read more